• 2019
  • February
  • January
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • Kluwer Trademark Blog – Brexit: Assurances on preservation of rights
    In a post on the Kluwer Trademark Blog, Stobbs comments on the recent assurances from the UK government about the continued protection of EUTM and RCD rights post-Brexit. Whilst the assurances are to be welcomed, there is still a long way to go before the details are worked out.   The ...
    Read More >
    KIT KAT Woe, Two in a Row
    The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has indicated that Nestlé should not own an EU trade mark registration for its four-finger bar (KIT KAT). Previous blog posts on the KIT KAT saga can be found here
    Read More >
    Stobbs contributes to EUIPO Quality Assurance Panel
    Earlier in July, Stobbs continued its participation, on behalf of CITMA, in the EUIPO
    Read More >
    Parallel Imports – Do I have a Legitimate Reason to Object?
    Parallel imports – genuine branded products put on the market by a rights holder in one territory and subsequently imported into a different territory by a third party without the rights holder’s consent - can offer consumers the opportunity to purchase authentic quality products at lower pri...
    Read More >
    UKIPO publishes its response to consultation on implementing the new EUTM Directive
    The UK government has now published (here) its response to its consultation and
    Read More >
    Safe Skies Fails to Unpick this Lock
    The General Court has ruled that the mark TSA LOCK, covering locks and bags, was validly registered. Safe Skies LLC (Safe Skies) applied to invalidate Travel Sentry, Inc.’s EUTM registration in 2014, but the Board of Appeal and now the General Court have both refused the application for invalid...
    Read More >
    Kluwer Trademark Blog – UK Supreme Court decides brand owners should pay costs of implementing blocking injunctions
    In a post on the Kluwer Trademark Blog, Stobbs comments on the Supreme Court's decision that brand owners should cover ISPs' costs for implementing site blocking injunctions. Will this decision put these orders out of the financial reach of most brand owners?   The full article can be ...
    Read More >
    The Little Red Sole strikes again, and this time it scores…
    Case C-163/16 – Christian Louboutin v Van Haren Schoenen BV: the CJEU’s preliminary ruling Although it might have been eclipsed by shoes of a different nature and purpose thanks to a certain football tournament which is hitting the media at the moment, fashionistas out the...
    Read More >
    Pawsecco: No more PDO puns
    Parties operating in the food and drink sector are likely to be well aware of the Protected Designations of Origin (PDOs), Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs) and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed (TSGs) relevant to their respective fields.  Well known examples include CHAMPAGNE wine, GO...
    Read More >
    A not-so-mythical error in law
    In the recent decision of Marriott v EUIPO, the EU General Court found the Board of Appeal and EUIPO Cancellation Decision had erred in law ...
    Read More >